What a session looks like:
90 minutes, 8–12 participants:
Opening: Ground in a specific Business Savvy principle or decision pattern.
Case presentation: One member presents a live decision or engagement challenge; business context, constraints, what you're trying to achieve, where you're stuck.
Structured examination: The group probes your assumptions, trade-offs, engagement logic. Not advice, just critical questioning. Where's the real constraint? What are you optimizing for? What's the actual cost? How does your framing affect team ownership?
Experiment design: Design a small test you can run in two weeks. Clear hypothesis, clear measures, clear engagement signal.
Owenship close: Commit to what you'll test. Report back next session on what happened, the outcomes and learning, not justification.
Between sessions, you run your experiment. You return with results, not excuses.
What to expect:
Sharper decision framing. Clearer links between behavior, engagement, and results. Greater credibility through explicit accountability. Fewer unpleasant surprises.
Also expect constructive discomfort. If everything feels comfortable, the work's too shallow.
What joining says about you:
You're willing to let your decisions and engagement assumptions be examined with critical curiosity. You accept that good intent doesn't guarantee good outcomes. You treat Business Savvy as a discipline, not a slogan. You carry greater accountability in exchange for greater influence, team buy-in, and sustained engagement.
This signals how seriously you take your role.